Nickname: sutcliffeg

Review: This is just an info request. Who could you direct me to talk to about a cell phone design? This is some real serious stuff for the future. Please advise. SG

Date reviewed: Aug 30, 2006 3:39 PM

Nickname: Tracybi37086

Review: I am so sick and tired of all these cell phones just make one that you can hear out of, take a good picture with, and price it around $50.00 and I'd be happy!

Date reviewed: Aug 29, 2006 8:40 PM

Nickname: Benny

Review: I'm waiting for the wristwatch version of a cell phone (which will be followed by the "Bone Phone" -- installed in arm bone). No more lost phones, change the band/face... and just glance at it when you want. Hold it up to near chin to answer. Drop down to hang up, waist level for "hold". What's all the fuss about a handheld cell phone... you're behind the times, you phone companies!

Date reviewed: Aug 29, 2006 1:21 AM

Nickname: Marc in Chicago

Review: Now, they only need to fix the awful software that runs on Moto phones. Then, I'll consider one of their phones.

Date reviewed: Jul 27, 2006 2:41 AM

Nickname: TheBrightpointFraud

Review: Who cares what Bob Laikin has to say about Motorola? Why don't you ask Robert Kaiser over at Cellstar? They have dealt more with Motorola than Brightpoint.

Date reviewed: Jul 26, 2006 3:58 PM

Nickname: solomonrex

Review: Shouldn't it be troubling that the new phones aren't thinner? Did their research tell them that this was ok? Was there any rationale given for this? Because all their competitors have been going after the thin aspect of the RAZRs. If they don't raise the bar with the second generation, they risk people losing interest in the sequel. I think they're doing well pursuing different form factors, like the low-selling PEBL, but if the RAZR itself isn't increasingly sexy, they risk losing their fickle fashion-driven market share.

Date reviewed: Jul 26, 2006 3:20 PM

Nickname: Denver Geeks

Review: Thank you, I enjoyed reading the article.

Date reviewed: Jul 26, 2006 7:11 AM