Nickname: wiredpasture

Review: OK, so as a consumer, I will choose the provider that offers the content I want, the fastest. But I still have to purchase the whole service to get one program? If the ISPs can charge a fee to content providers for faster delivery, I don't want to have to buy every provider to get all the content I want at satisfying speeds. If there is no Net neutrality then as a consumer I should be able to purchase the content I want ala carte.

Date reviewed: Jul 8, 2006 3:31 AM

Nickname: Larry

Review: My comment is AT&T: 1; Consumer: 0.

Date reviewed: Jul 7, 2006 8:19 PM

Nickname: Freddy

Review: Google doesn't push the content down the telco lines, the customers request the information. So why do the telco's think they should limit what the consumer can do with the Internet connection they are paying for? It's not illegal and it's not causing any harm. The file sharing is eating up more bandwidth than Google search--lol.

Date reviewed: Jul 6, 2006 6:50 PM

Nickname: solos

Review: Eventually, it is better to separate the content providers from the delivery providers. Just like the road transportation system, you have the road, the truck companies, and the wholesale and retail companies.

Date reviewed: Jul 6, 2006 5:39 AM

Nickname: Happen

Review: It is very suggestive to the Chinese telecom market.

Date reviewed: Jul 5, 2006 7:40 AM