Most recent comments


See all comments
Leave your own comments

Nickname: had them all
Review: I'm a big fan of the smart phone. I tried to go to the Motorola 551 because it was smaller but it kept ruining my contacts in Outlook. I've had a Treo ever since. The E62 does look interesting though, but Moto has soured me on trying a new OS.
Date reviewed: Jan 24, 2007 6:45 PM
Nickname: Peebz
Review: The US is the worst mobile market in the world, ages behind even technologies available in the developing markets. Hence the limited knowledge of capabilities of GSM or mobile phones (compatibility and connectivity). So let's not ask Americans for comparison between Moto and Nokia. Think Symbian and Java. Check the various software available for practically every purpose for use on Nokia - and let's not forget flawless design, operation, standard features, improvements in new models, and on... on..... Wake up Americans.
Date reviewed: Jan 17, 2007 11:15 AM
Nickname: ChicagoGuy27
Review: I have used Motorola for over 5 years now, most recently the RAZR (because it was the "it" phone, just because people had it? Not because it worked well). Just went to the Nokia store on Michigan Ave and bought a N70. The best phone I have had yet. The RAZR sucks by far in comparison. I don't understand how you people think the Motorola software is good. It freezes and is always so slow when I'm trying to send a quick text. Not to mention the browser on the Nokia is like my PC's browser. You can see the Web how it's suppose to be seen. Can't say the same for the RAZR. New Nokia fan for life!
Date reviewed: Sep 11, 2006 8:37 AM
Nickname: Ordxpres
Review: People, what are you talking about? Motorola the best phone? Never. Their menus are the most primitive I have seen in years. The buttons on RAZR or SLVR or other crap are so inconvenient to use that it's beyond me why anyone would want that phone. As far as the design goes, ok, it is an engineering beauty. But beyond that, this phone has features dating back to 2004: VGA camera, low resolution display, useless GUI. I could go on and on... Basicaly all Motos are exactly the same these days, except slammed into different cases. Look at Symbian/S60 and you'll see what a phone should look like.
Date reviewed: Jul 20, 2006 7:59 PM
Nickname: The Phone Dude
Review: Wait till you see the new RAZR 2!!! If you liked the first one, wait till you see the killer replacement. Available this Christmas.
Date reviewed: Jul 18, 2006 3:17 PM
Nickname: Danl
Review: Nokia is spitting in the wind. One high end store in a trendy shopping area in Chicago is NOT going to overcome the natural perception of the company as a quitter, based on product performance, that Nokia phones are giveaway freebies that are almost worth the price.
Date reviewed: Jul 18, 2006 2:51 PM
Nickname: Convergeance
Review: The Razr is so 2005. Video blogging is coming into its own and Nokia's N series phones are leading the future.
Date reviewed: Jul 4, 2006 3:18 PM
Nickname: edward cotton
Review: Nokia's store in Chicago is great, but the Orange store in Rotterdam is even better. More information here.. <A HREF=?http://www.influxinsights.com/index.php?id=797"> here</A>
Date reviewed: Jun 29, 2006 1:55 PM
Nickname: Innocent Bystander
Review: My kids have Nokias, I have a RAZR. Guess which handset they want to migrate to? The best designed phone, both ergonomically and software-friendly, in the market today. Hats off to Moto for getting it right.
Date reviewed: Jun 29, 2006 1:00 AM
Nickname: bobbie
Review: Over the past 10 years I have had about five cell phones. The easiest, fastest wireless I ever had was without a doubt the Nokia brand.
Date reviewed: Jun 28, 2006 4:38 PM
See all comments
Leave your own comments



The views and opinions expressed in these comments do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of BusinessWeek or the McGraw-Hill Companies.