Nickname: Adrian

Review: crap interior

Date reviewed: Sep 13, 2007 11:18 AM

Nickname: Bmac

Review: I like the looks of this car, but it seems idiotic to spend that much money on a car if you want speed and power. You can buy a Nissan Skyline GT-R for under $60,000, have half the turbos of the Bugatti and still pump out more power with intense engine work. True it involves a great deal of time but I think that it's more fulfilling to actually do something to create horsepower, plus you'll spend far less than a million dollars...

Date reviewed: Mar 16, 2007 11:05 PM

Nickname: Ankoku

Review: I'd much rather pay less and get an SSC Ultimate Aero, it would eat that Veyron in a race. I think that car's way over-rated.

Date reviewed: Mar 16, 2007 10:57 PM

Nickname: jimmer

Review: ok you guys, sure the old beauties of the marque were astounding and sleek and one-of-a-kinds. this new Bugatti is a leap ahead into fantasy HERE AND NOW. 16 cyls and 4 turbos alone makes this the most recent WONDERCAR of our time. A note about the purists who tout their old beauties with the teardrop butts and original Bugatti grills and streamlines - I understand your points but progress in design and technology marches on. My personal choice and love in the auto world are the 356 series speedsters but I can still appreciate the newfangled and supertechnico Porsche monsters of the moment. Ah, Highway One on a non-tourist weekday with Sweet Mary, a picnic lunch, Beatles on the music machine (when not humming along with the exhaust tune)and of course a Porsche speedster - the best sports car ever designed! hah

Date reviewed: Dec 13, 2006 3:12 PM

Nickname: WC

Review: I'm glad that so many have such a good sense of humor. The 16.4 has the look of the cars portrayed in the flick I-Robot. I'd be even more impressed if their future production models get 45 miles per gallon and went from 175 to 0 in 1secondflat without scrunching up like a pile of aluminum. Are Bonzi trees stronger than all other attractive wood types, or are they just smaller and older? When did smaller and older (brand names) become so much of our "new & improved" future. Nice article, pretty car, pretty fast car, comfortable car (I'll most likely never know for sure first hand) and for sure a very expensive car. If I had that kind of money I'd buy a small ranch house (3/2) in Santa Monica by the beach...

Date reviewed: Dec 6, 2006 4:18 AM

Nickname: riet

Review: I'd rather drive my REAL Bugatti, a 1931 T40A. It is a jewel and represents the beauty and elegance of a true Bugatti.

Date reviewed: Dec 6, 2006 2:51 AM

Nickname: Bard Judith

Review: Excess? Try fantasy. The description of the interior reads like something out of a Harry Potter novel: "dove-skin upholstery, a lacquered bonsai shift lever topped by a solid-gold knob inlaid with narwhal horn..." Not to mention for that price, one expects it to fly a la Chitty-Chitty-Bang-Bang.

Date reviewed: Nov 23, 2006 5:11 PM

Nickname: DeBoz

Review: Well, it's not the money, but it is really kind of ugly. Disappointing.

Date reviewed: Oct 1, 2006 9:32 PM

Nickname: antisissy

Review: You people are jealous and lame. The Veyron is the sweetest car ever. Just because you can't afford one doesn't mean it sucks. You just wish you could drive such an awesome car.

Date reviewed: Jul 15, 2006 9:58 AM

Nickname: h2o baby

Review: This car is overdone. Granted it will turn heads but is it really worth so much darn money? You could take a car from the frame out and have it reach 250 mph and only spend a fraction of the cost. Whoopty freakin do.

Date reviewed: Jul 3, 2006 7:11 PM