Rating:

Nickname: gfortman

Review: Ordered my wife's SKY on 3/7/05, took delivery 5/1/06. It was worth every minute of the 14 month wait. Awesome styling, quite peppy, reasonable priced, tight steering, and MUCH better looking than the Solstice. An aftermarket windscreen ($80) makes highways bearable.

Date reviewed: Jun 19, 2006 8:49 PM

Rating:

Nickname: Jack

Review: It's like a poor mans vett. Not as fast but fun to drive.

Date reviewed: Jun 15, 2006 10:36 PM

Rating:

Nickname: cynthia

Review: Ordered 5/19 and told to "wait four months." At least it will still be pleasant driving in the fall.

Date reviewed: Jun 14, 2006 2:39 AM

Rating:

Nickname: Dianne

Review: The price ended up being $33,000+ with automatic and NO TRUNK. Not even a place inside to put a purse. Great look but only as a second car.

Date reviewed: Jun 9, 2006 4:43 AM

Rating:

Nickname: Rocky

Review: I've put 2,200 miles on my Sky over the last 6 weeks I've had her. The car is impressive, no problems so far, and so much fun to drive.

Date reviewed: Jun 6, 2006 6:52 PM

Rating:

Nickname: "Buster"

Review: Picked up my Sky 5 13 ... Beautiful styling ... a head turner ... just a blast to drive ... received comments from 18 yr old girls to 60 year old men - all agree my car is beautiful ... top operation is not that bad ... storage is not what I bought it for ... Miata/Soltice are nice cars... the Sky is a beautiful car ... but that's why they make chocolate & vanilla ... everyone's tastes are different ... but the Sky is BEAUTIFUL

Date reviewed: Jun 6, 2006 5:16 PM

Rating:

Nickname: bobfred4

Review: This car is solid inside and out. Could use a little more HP but 177 is fine. Handling is excellent, feel is great, looks are superior and glad I bought it.

Date reviewed: Jun 6, 2006 4:11 PM

Rating:

Nickname: gauchosmart

Review: The Sky is very tight on curves and solid on the highway. The interior totally rocks except for the cup holders. Love the dash.

Date reviewed: Jun 3, 2006 2:56 PM

Rating:

Nickname: norman

Review: The pictures show this Sky car is very low on the ground. Why are you saying it's high? A Hummer is high. This car isn't high.

Date reviewed: Jun 1, 2006 10:16 PM

Rating:

Nickname: HK

Review: The design of the car itself is great, and it looks like a much more expensive car. However, it's still not comparable to similar cars in terms of performance. One reason being so heavy-- having 170HP and still needs 7.2 secs to go from 0-60? Reliability remains to be seen. However, I do expect it to have quite a few problems. Talking about cupholders breaking already.

Date reviewed: Jun 1, 2006 7:56 PM