Nickname: Kilroy

Review: Six patents comprising 10 claims, not 10 patents as the article states--but there's a real story to be told here. Maybe you can start looking into why a Micron lawyer authored an FTC document and why, when its own administrative law judge ruled resoundingly in Rambus' favor, the FTC simply refuses to let its case against Rambus go, incredibly, when the DOJ has made it clear that the harm to consumers was perpetrated by the memory manufacturers acting in collusion, not Rambus.

Date reviewed: Apr 25, 2006 10:55 AM

Nickname: JDCanuck

Review: Thanks so very much for the way you have presented this case and the background surrounding it with a minimum of errors. As a follower of Rambus for the last few years, I have been dismayed by the many twisted articles that denied the facts surrounding this company. Let's hope this case will set a new standard and that a small, innovative company that is based on the inventions of the very bright people in America like Rambus may be permitted to survive the massive resistance to fair payment that is so common in our marketplace. The future of our economy depends on it.

Date reviewed: Apr 25, 2006 7:54 AM