Nickname: adopt

Review: Actually, there had been several times that the two nations were on the edge of provoking a trade war. The reason why the trade hawks' claims were dismissed was obvious: The escalation of a trade dispute would do nothing but politicize the problem. China, undoubtedly, should find solutions to address the dreadful trade gap, such as fulfilling all the promises it agreed to.

Date reviewed: Apr 12, 2006 1:37 PM

Nickname: Dr. Martin Grove

Review: There should be no discussions with China until the Communist Party goes away and the country embraces democratic values and norms. Look what they did to the Tibetans. Are we next?

Date reviewed: Apr 12, 2006 11:00 AM

Nickname: Fair trade??

Review: What's fair trade? Look at what the U.S. government has done with its own steel industry and agriculture. Oh, how fair they are.

Date reviewed: Apr 8, 2006 3:04 PM

Nickname: Common Sense

Review: "Political theater?" When car parts from China are duty-free in North American markets and 30% to 40% in China this is not theater. Their consumers cannot afford and sometimes cannot even access North American made products due to the protectionist measures of China. When will we see WTO rules change to force China to lower its tariff and non-tariff barriers?

Date reviewed: Apr 7, 2006 12:35 PM

Nickname: Fair Trade Commision

Review: If China had traded fairly, there wouldn't have been any problem.

Date reviewed: Apr 6, 2006 8:11 PM

Nickname: clear-head

Review: A real trade war could hurt both sides, so the U.S. and China should avoid it. The U.S. always blames China for its high trade deficits, but ignores its consumption condition, which is the crucial criminal.

Date reviewed: Apr 5, 2006 2:37 AM