Most recent comments


See all comments
Leave your own comments

Nickname: XenChi
Review: Hyundai's & Kia's are garbage. It's one thing to only be able to afford a garbage vehicle it's quite another to try and justify it to others. You know the car is crap when you get in it it feels like crap. Hell if you try to exceed 80 mph the car starts to sway from side to side (KIA). If these cars are the best you can do than so be it. Just stop trying to make them justifiable please. I'm getting tired of putting you guys in your place. P.S. Hyundai masturbates to the idea of someday being equal to Honda. Yeah...... you heard me, Honda. How lame is that? Guess Hyundai misses it's old rival Daewoo.
Date reviewed: Mar 26, 2009 3:32 AM
Nickname: Striker
Review: Hyundai has a long way to go, for one thing, the 1997 oldsmobile I traded in for a Hyundai was, after a period of time a much better car than the GT Hyundai, the GT has developed all sorts of fit and finish problems, rear spoiler came loose, rattles in door.
Date reviewed: Mar 16, 2006 11:50 PM
Nickname: tas
Review: Come on GoKorea, are you saying that only Hyundai and Kia care about making cars for the average Joe, and all other makers donīt care and they just mind to race? Well, itīs very hard to believe in this assumption. Anyway, sooner or later, Korean makers will get enough stamina to enter motor sports for real--and I hope they succeed. Then, consumers will consider Hyundai a car with some passion. Avarage Joes like passion, too. This is one reason why they watch a NASCAR race. Donīt they?
Date reviewed: Feb 20, 2006 5:42 PM
Nickname: gokorea
Review: Passion to make cars? One word for passion can describe Hyundai: Azera. More interior volume than Toyota Avalon, Mercedes S-Class, and BMW 760i. A Hyundai in the same sentence as Mercedes S class? BMW 760i? They have passion for the average Joe. Avg. Joe doesn't care how many rally races were won in the last five years. Passion to build an affordable car. Passion to stand by its product.
Date reviewed: Feb 20, 2006 4:33 AM
Nickname: tas
Review: Why should they (Kia or Hyundai) enter motor sports? For the same reason why Ford, Honda, Toyota, GM, VW (Audi), Mercedes, Mitsubishi, Subaru, Fiat (Ferrari), and Nissan: passion. Passion to make cars, best cars, reliable cars, reach the limits of a technology and of the skills. Doesnīt it matter? Maybe, the only inspiration to Koream is to struggle with Japanese makers.
Date reviewed: Feb 16, 2006 7:57 PM
Nickname: Der
Review: I had driven various Mercedes, BMWs, Nissan, Suburban, Toyota, etc but somehow I am very tempted to try a Hyundai. I really think it is a great deal!
Date reviewed: Feb 16, 2006 5:54 PM
Nickname: tas
Review: Mr. Axm, Kia 10-year warranty is limited and applies to the first owner. If someone intends to buy a new car and keep it for 10 years, maybe it could be a choice.
Date reviewed: Feb 16, 2006 12:58 PM
Nickname: gokorea
Review: Concerning TAS's comment on if Hyundai or Kia won a F-1, Dakar, NASCAR, Indy, or any racing championship: Why should they? Sure making a race car and entering in competition might help their image, but I'm sure they would like to use their assets and capital on making an economically sound and reliable cars, rather than bragging about how many championship they'ev won. Right now, they are only concerned with taking over Japananese rival companies. After they do that, then let's see, but for the momemt Hyundai and Kia are not worried about racing around a track.
Date reviewed: Feb 15, 2006 8:04 PM
Nickname: axm
Review: As a working man with two kids, two dogs, and limited resources, I care about a 100,00 mile/10-year warranty and decent price structure. I could care less about who won a race because I live in the real world. Give me a Kia.
Date reviewed: Feb 13, 2006 7:51 PM
Nickname: correction
Review: Honda and Ford shouldn't be in the same comparison with BMW. They don't even belong in the same sentence.
Date reviewed: Feb 13, 2006 6:17 AM
See all comments
Leave your own comments



The views and opinions expressed in these comments do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of BusinessWeek or the McGraw-Hill Companies.