Nickname: Woz

Review: Charles makes a good point that virus activity can be tracked within the network, but individual subscribers have already fallen victim to a virus (and possibly paid extra connection costs for inadvertently transmitting the virus on) once that activity has been identified. I think individuals and companies will still need to pay a subscription for regular definition updates and software to protect their mobile devices and data.

Date reviewed: Feb 2, 2006 2:05 PM

Nickname: Wabi

Review: Overlooking mobile technology worldwide, it is not difficult to understand why such technology is going faster and faster. Needless to say, the demand of mobile technology turns a lot of great ideas into reality like blue-tooth, wi-fi, PDA phone and so on; however, faster and easiler connectivity of mobile devices is providing a convenient way to someone spreading their virus in certain extent. On the other hand, the threat brings a huge market of anti-virus business in near future to those aggressive anti-virus providers like Trend Micro, McAfee and Yankee.

Date reviewed: Jan 10, 2006 3:45 PM

Nickname: Nick

Review: Interesting report, but also yet another example of a new monthly fee. Monthly fees eat into annual disposable incomes. Technology comes with a high price.

Date reviewed: Jan 8, 2006 5:34 PM

Nickname: virus

Review: Good report.

Date reviewed: Jan 6, 2006 4:00 AM

Nickname: Charles

Review: There is also new anti-virus technology emerging that works within mobile eetworks, and doesn't require any software or fees on the phone. See Theta Networks: http://www.thetanetworks.com/mobile_network_security.html

Date reviewed: Jan 5, 2006 11:37 PM

Nickname: healthy

Review: The more critical the information is, the more consumers should pay.

Date reviewed: Jan 5, 2006 4:13 PM