Nickname: whateverman1000

Review: These comments below, though somewhat true, are just from people looking to bash for the sake of bashing. Motorola is clearly making grounds to redeem the market share it lost years ago to Nokia. Nokia got its edge due to style and now with its Symbian OS, which admittedly is better than any other manfacturer's out there. RazR, RokR, and now Q, along with other product lines I'm sure are a testament to the company's committment to remain "cutting-edge," at least in terms of style and user-friendliness. The article makes it clear that style and design first, engineering later. For better or worse, it has caused a "buzz" in this icon of cellular phones. What would the critics prefer? Stay tehchnologically advanced but no design or style and continue to not sell these phones? People will just find a reason to criticize anything. Go Moto!

Date reviewed: Sep 1, 2005 4:36 PM

Nickname: dlew

Review: Beyond looks the Razr is a miserable phone. The OS is five years old and the sync software does NOT work as advertised.

Date reviewed: Aug 9, 2005 9:03 PM

Nickname: msmobiles.com

Review: Unfortunately, Motorola has a bad track record with releasing Microsoft powered phones: Motorola MPx100 totally canceled and Motorola MPx canceled before it arrived to Europe and USA. Potential is big but if Motorola delays Motorola Q as it delayed Motorola MPx220 and other models then chances are low, particularly because Nokia already sells smartphones for UMTS/3G networks and Motorola doesn't have them even in plans yet!

Date reviewed: Aug 8, 2005 4:26 PM

Nickname: kalifov

Review: I don't understand these comments about particular products. "Success won't come from one phone, no matter how slick." Motorola is doing very good with the Razr and this particular product is helping the company to recover. Something revolutionary is expected too with the Q. Anyway, the point is how 'companies are increasing their emphasis on creativity and innovation,' and Motorola and its leader, Ed Zander, are pioneers of this movement.

Date reviewed: Jul 29, 2005 6:17 PM

Nickname: chris

Review: Motorola must use the Rim software for the "pushed e-mail" and triple des encryption. With Rim software you do have to log on and wait to download. Triple des encryption has never been broken.

Date reviewed: Jul 29, 2005 2:05 PM

Nickname: Matt

Review: Let's face it, Motorola got lucky with the Razr. The Razr has an incredible design, but unfortunately the user interface is terrible. The Q could have been a spectacular product, but instead it will be a relative non-starter due to the boneheaded inclusion of Windows Mobile. Windows Mobile? Windows is the direct cause of so much misery in the world, so why on earth would I want Windows on my cell phone? And those sunglasses? Please. There must be some other way to waste $300 to look like a jerk. The SLVR and PEBL look rather interesting, though. They should fire whoever came up with that idiotic video-phone idea. Come ON!

Date reviewed: Jul 28, 2005 6:12 PM

Nickname: aj

Review: Is this article supposed to make me believe that the products currently making Motorola profitable were not developed on Lynch's watch? Wow, do you guys ever underestimate your readers. This article slams the guy who made the changes in the Motorola cell phone division happen. Looks like his resignation was a smart move. Zander is one thunder-stealing executive.

Date reviewed: Jul 28, 2005 4:28 PM

Nickname: SAM

Review: I saw the Razor Phone on Motorola's Web site months before it came out. As soon as it was available I paid $500 for the phone and could not be happier about it. It will be the same with the Q. I am already lined up to purchse one. GO MOT.

Date reviewed: Jul 28, 2005 3:48 PM

Nickname: steve o

Review: Being a 24-year Motorolan, I have been waiting for years for a "Zander." Even though I am on disablity I am as excited as the current workers.

Date reviewed: Jul 28, 2005 3:32 PM

Nickname: Iowans

Review: We certainly enjoy the positive sounds coming from Motorola, these days!! Let's hope the teamwork continues!!

Date reviewed: Jul 28, 2005 3:03 PM