Most recent comments
See all comments
Leave your own comments
Nickname: nanheyangrouchuan
Review: Poor people wouldn't riot because they have to cut back on spending, more fiscal discipline is needed in this country anyway, what a foolish exaggeration. The tariff would force companies to diversify their outsourcing operations which would be a big win for other developing countries and the low prices would return to the U.S. consumer after about 1-1 1/2 years. As for putting tariffs on Japanese cars, Honda and Toyota make most of their cars in the U.S., so U.S. workers and consumers would be hurt. Your pro-China, anti-Japan stance gives away your identity.
Date reviewed: Sep 29, 2006 3:20 PM
Nickname: To: nanheyangrouchuan
Review: If the U.S. slapped the 27.5% tariffs, I'm afraid that the poor people in the U.S. will riot. I mean, they have already suffered the loss of their family members in the invasion of Iraq. China and the U.S. complement each other in their businesses. Now if the U.S. slapped the tariff on Japanese cars, that might save the auto industry and economy in the U.S.
Date reviewed: Sep 29, 2006 12:28 AM
Nickname: nanheyangrouchuan
Review: To: my responder
China's cheap goods represents the WTO's crack addiction. They are cheap and make you feel good while your body and mind rot.
The world is going to need to go "cold turkey" off of China and the sooner the better, especially for other developing countries which are sitting on the sidelines while China sucks up every dollar, euro, yen and pound, not to mention the natural resources.
Date reviewed: Sep 28, 2006 1:33 AM
Nickname: To: nanheyangrouchuan
Review: Anyone with some basic understanding of economics would know that the growth of China is beneficial to economies around the world, including that of the US. Stop being so sentimental and try to understand fundamentals and stay with the realities of globalization for a change.
Date reviewed: Sep 26, 2006 10:58 PM
Nickname: nanheyangrouchuan
Review: Decades of playing soft with China has resulted in China getting most of what it wants (MNF, WTO) and the rest of the world getting little. Paulson will have just as much impact. Perhaps 6 months of 27.5% tariffs in the US will show the Chinese we mean business, otherwise negotiations will continue endlessly and the exchange rate will take 10 years to reach 7:1.
Date reviewed: Sep 26, 2006 7:31 AM
Nickname: Jan
Review: you censored my comments. no fun in leaving it anymore
Date reviewed: Sep 25, 2006 8:04 AM
Nickname: K9guru
Review: Not only will "myspace" hit big in China
so will "K9guru" from California and all the dog loving people of China. Pets are a big Business now in China. The K9guru
from San Francisco who now resides in
Malibu next to Los Angeles, California
will be making strategic business offers to the Chinese Dog loving population. He can be reached Via email @ info@K9guru.com
or k9guru@earthlink.net
Date reviewed: Sep 23, 2006 9:08 AM
Nickname: Not White
Review: I can hardly believe R Murdoch (Fox!!) will be attemtping to accomodate other, non-white (!) peoples into their objectives. How about some Chinese-American anchor-people in some NEW, HONEST, LESS RACIST newscasts? Then, maybe, Myspace in China.
Date reviewed: Sep 22, 2006 6:09 PM
Nickname: Esther
Review: Actually I beg to differ. Tencent QQ (similar to MSN messenger) has launced a very succesful QQ space (targeted especially at Gen Y QQ users). These millions of users are regularly spending money to update their blogs and decorate their sites with banners, cursors, pictures, downloaded music...everything imaginable.
Date reviewed: Sep 22, 2006 11:10 AM
Nickname: jlombardo
Review: This article is too loose with the facts.
One, www.dudu.com is not a social networking portal. Two, Google sold its 2.6% stake in Baidu in June - so it is clearly no longer a stakeholder.
Interesting article, but please get the simple facts straight.
Date reviewed: Sep 22, 2006 4:17 AM
See all comments
Leave your own comments
The views and opinions expressed in these comments do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of BusinessWeek or the McGraw-Hill Companies.